im»FPA ^SSLp^ EJSCREEN Report
tri r"\ Agency
for 1 mile Ring around the Corridor, COLORADO, EPA Region 8
Approximate Population: 681
USA
Percentile
EPA Region
Percentile
Selected Variables
State
Percentile
EJ Indexes
! EJ Index for PM2.5
63
EJ Index for Ozone
61
EJ Index for NATA Diesel PM
66
EJ Index for NATA Air Toxics Cancer Risk
65
| EJ Index for NATA Respiratory Hazard Index
66
EJ Index for NATA Neurological Hazard Index
64
1 EJ Index for Traffic Proximity and Volume
66
EJ Index for Lead Paint Indicator
18
EJ Index for Proximity to NPL sites
63
EJ Index for Proximity to RMP sites
EJ Index for Proximity to TSDFs
64
EJ Index for Proximity to Major Direct Dischargers
65
This report shows environmental, demographic, and EJ indicator values. It shows environmental and demographic raw data (e.g., the estimated concentration of
ozone in the air), and also shows what percentile each raw data value represents. These percentiles provide perspective on how the selected block group or
buffer area compares to the entire state, EPA region, or nation. For example, if a given iocation is at the 95th percentile nationwide, this means that only 5
percent of the US population has a higher block group value than the average person in the location being analyzed. The years for which the data are available,
and the methods used, vary across these indicators. Important caveats and uncertainties apply to this screening-level information, so it is essential to understand
the limitations on appropriate interpretations and applications of these indicators. Please see EJSCREEN documentation for discussion of these issues before using
reports.
August 11, 2015
1/3
4001175
ED 000552C 00027067-00001
oEPA Protect EJSCREEN Report
for 1 mile Ring around the Corridor, COLORADO, EPA Region 8
Approximate Population: 681
August 11, 2015
2/3
4001175
ED 000552C 00027067-00002
EPAE1rap"n EJSCREEN Report
for 1 mile Ring around the Corridor, COLORADO, EPA Region 8
Approximate Population: 681
| Selected Variables
Raw
Data
State
Avg.
%ile in
State
- ..
EPA %ile in 1 , 1
_ . rnft f USA %ile in
Region EPA
S Avg. USA j
Avg. Region 1
{Environmental Indicators
Particulate Matter (pm 2.5 in pg/m3)
Ozone (ppb)
4.82
56.3
6.45
55.8
4
56
6.94 1 1 9.78 [ 0 |
51.8 79 , 46 1 93
; NATA Diesel PM (pg/m3)*
0.00713
1.03
1
0.657 <50th | 0 824 <50th i-
NATA Cancer Risk (lifetimerisk per million)*
9.1
45
0
35 <50th T 49 § <50th
i NATA Respiratory Hazard Index*
0.16
1.9
0
1 4 <50th f 2 3 <50th
NATA Neurological Hazard Index*
0.018
0.054
0
0 047 <50th | 0 063 <50th '
Traffic Proximity and Volume (daily traffic count/distance to roac)
1.9
110
2
80
6 iioT_ 4 !
Lead Paint Indicator (% Pre-1960 Housing)
0.48
0.2
83
0.23
82 0 3 73 i
NPL Proximity (site count/km distance)
0 012
0.072
22
0.083
32 0.096 1 12
RMP Proximity (facility count/km distanc^
0.011
0.25
1
0.24
2 0.31 i 0
TSDF Proximity (facility count/km distanc^
0 0061
0 045
15
0 028
55 0.054
14
5
Water Discharger Proximity (facility count/km distance)
0.033
0.23
4
0.19
12 0.25
Demographic Indicators
Demographic Index
27%
30%
55
27%
Minority Population
19%
30%
39
23%
56 } 36%
40
Low Income Population
36%
30%
66
58
Linguistically Isolated Population
1%
3%
51
3%
60 5%
49 *
Population With Less Than High School Education
9%
10%
59
10%
59 14%
40 1
Population Under 5 years of age
4%
7%
27
7%
22 7%
28 1
Population over 64 years of age
15%
11%
74
11%
71 j 13% | 65 |
* The National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) is EPA's ongoing, comprehensive evaluation of air toxics in the United States. EPA developed the NATA to
prioritize air toxics, emission sources, and locations of interest for further study. It is important to remember that NATA provides broad estimates of health risks
over geographic areas of the country, not definitive risks to specific individuals or locations. More information on the NATA analysis can be found
at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/natamain/index.html.
For additional information, see: www.epa.gov/environmentaliustice
EJSCREEN is a screening tool for pre-decisiona! use oniy. it can heip identify areas that may warrant additional consideration, analysis, or outreach. It does not
provide a basis for decision-making, but it may heip identify potential areas of EJ concern. Users should keep in mind that screening tools are subject to substantial
uncertainty in their demographic and environmental data, particularly when looking at small geographic areas. Important caveats and uncertainties apply to this
screening-level information, so it is essential to understand the limitations on appropriate interpretations and applications of these indicators. Please see
EJSCREEN documentation for discussion of these issues before using reports. This screening tool does not provide data on every environmental impact and
demographic factor that may be relevant to a particular location. EJSCREEN outputs should be supplemented with additional information and local knowledge
before taking any action to address potential EJ concerns.
August 1 1 , 2015 3/3
4001175
ED 000552C 00027067-00003